LOGiMIX use case: admixture rationalization
Simplifying a four-line admixture system from three vendors to two, without losing pumping stability or print-edge definition.
The situation
A printing integrator was running four admixture lines, a VMA, an accelerator, a plasticizer, and a fiber dispersion, sourced from three vendors. The production calendar was demanding cleaner color changeovers and tighter cycles. The technical question was whether the stack could be simplified, and where the rheology and surface-quality risk would land if it was.
What we did
Compatibility analysis across the candidate two-vendor combinations. A side-by-side rheology profile of the current and proposed stacks. A review of the producer’s own QC log to identify the lot-certification overhead being absorbed under the current system. A recommended stack with a documented purge protocol for color changeover. The rheology-profile comparison structure is the same one that runs inside every LOGiMIX report, so the consulting deliverable matches the engine’s report output directly.
The outcome
A two-vendor stack with equivalent rheology, a shorter purge between colors, and a meaningful reduction in lot-certification overhead in the QC group. Per-unit admixture spend down modestly. The producer’s QC director now uses the same rheology-profile comparison as standard practice on any new admixture inquiry.
This page describes a composite of common LOGiMIX engagements and does not refer to a specific past customer, project, or engagement terms. Outcomes vary considerably with project specifics and are not guaranteed. Sunnyday Technologies provides technical analysis. Sunnyday Technologies does not provide professional engineering, legal, regulatory, or financial advice. Engineering sign-off on any specific project remains the responsibility of the licensed engineer of record.